Rupert Sutherland, Principal Investigator, GNS Science
John Townend, Principal Investigator, Victoria University of Wellington
Virginia Toy, Principal Investigator, University of Otago
Simon Cox, Quaternary Team Leader, GNS Science
The start of DFDP-2 drilling activities in the Whataroa Valley 1/9/2014. |
The aim of the DFDP-2 project is to examine a major fault before it ruptures in a large earthquake. What are the ambient conditions in the fault zone? What are the physical properties of the materials? What is the fault zone’s internal structure? Answers to these and many other questions will help us understand what happens when a fault ruptures in an earthquake and how slip accumulates to form a plate boundary. Have a look at our video for an introduction to the DFDP-2 project:
Our results will have implications for global earthquake science. This is why scientists from twelve countries have come together to gather information on fault geometry, temperature and pressure conditions, collect rock and fluid samples, and install long-term monitoring equipment. It is also why the international community, via the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP) has funded more than half of the project, and why we have been successful in obtaining funding from the Marsden Fund.
The DFDP-2 project will have specific value to New Zealanders. It is surely important to understand the largest source of seismic hazard in South Island. What will happen during and after the next major earthquake? Does the hazard vary from day to day? Does anything unusual happen before an earthquake? Could we develop a warning system? Does the Alpine Fault offer benefits as well as hazards? For example, does the fault host a geothermal resource? Our project will help address these questions too.
DFDP-2A during coring of sediments 17/9/2014. |
On 14 September, we started coring sediments. After moderate recovery between 125 and 160 m, we drilled open-hole with a stratopack bit and rapidly progressed to 206 m. On 17 September, we stopped coring glacial diamictites at 212 m depth.
Rupert Sutherland and Simon Cox inspect core. |
The relatively young (<500 yr) cobbly river gravels are only a few metres thick. Below this, to a depth of about 50 m, there is a sequence of pebbly river gravels that are at least 12,000 yr old. Deposits from an ancient river delta are found between 50 and 77 m depth, and below this, we discovered a thick sequence of silts, likely deposited on the bed of an ancient lake that filled the space carved out by a glacier. Below 197 m, we find evidence for rocks that were rafted and dropped into a fairly deep lake from floating ice as the glacier retreated.
We infer that the lake-bed was at least 300 m below the sea level of the time, which itself was at least 100 m lower than today. We are examining samples to see if it was a marine fiord. We have recovered many wood samples suitable for radio-carbon dating the thick sequence of sediments.
The steepness of the valley wall is a surprise to every scientist involved. There are very few slopes >50 m in extent that dip >45° in the modern topography. How has the rock face stayed so steep? Does this have implications for the strength of shaking during Alpine Fault earthquakes? We are only 1 km from the surface trace of the fault.
The static water level in the upper gravel unit (29 m depth) is about 5 m below ground surface. Below 120 m, we encountered artesian pressures, as anticipated, but a shut-in pressure could not be determined. Low flow rates (<0.3 l/min) imply low permeability, consistent with high silt contents.
We measured the temperature at 120 m depth in DFDP-2A and calculated a geothermal gradient of 139°C/km. This result needs to be interpreted with caution. First, slight artesian flow of warm water from the open hole below 120 m depth may be significant. The corrected value may be closer to 80°C/km. Second, we anticipated an elevated geothermal gradient and artesian pressures based on hydrogeological modelling, and it may not persist to greater depth.
Scientific drilling often provides unexpected results. The new sediment thickness, temperature, and fluid pressure data are useful for planning deeper operations, but we also have to now re-examine models of landscape evolution, geothermal circulation, and ancient fault movements in the Southern Alps.
Operations continue and the project is ramping up to its main phase. The first hole, DFDP-2A, is now a monitoring hole that we had originally intended to drill later. On 24 September, we began pulling casing and then we started a new borehole, DFDP-2B, about 10 m closer to the valley wall. We have since installed 16” casing to 47 m using dual-rotary-air and are about to start dual-rotary-mud. This has caused about a week’s delay, but we may make up time if bedrock is not much below 220 m. Stay tuned!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGreat post! Geothermal drilling rig play such a crucial role in tapping into the Earth's natural heat for sustainable energy. It's fascinating to see how these specialized rigs are designed to handle the unique challenges of geothermal environments, from extreme heat to deep, hard rock formations. The precision and technology required for drilling to reach geothermal reservoirs are truly impressive, and it’s amazing how advancements in drilling techniques are helping make geothermal energy more accessible and cost-effective.
ReplyDelete